This Book is free of charge and can in no way constitute a source of business.
You are free to copy this Book for your preaching, or for distribution, or also for your Evangelism on Social Media, provided that its content is not modified or altered in any way, and that the website mcreveil.org is cited as the source.
Woe to you, greedy agents of satan who will try to market these teachings and testimonies!
Woe to you, sons of satan who like to publish these teachings and testimonies on Social Media while hiding the address of the website www.mcreveil.org, or falsifying their contents!
Know that you can escape the justice system of men, but you certainly will not escape the judgment of God.
You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to Hell? Matthew 23:33
Nota Bene
This Book is regularly updated. We recommend that you download the latest version from www.mcreveil.org.
COVID-19:
A JUICY BUSINESS FOR HOSPITALS
(Updated on 03 02 2024)
Dear
brothers and friends, we would
like to make available to you this very edifying article, which
summarises the
book by Patrick Jaulent entitled: "Un
Monde de Menteurs: La
Cyber Surveillance au Service de la Vérité", which
in English
translates. "A World of Liars: Cyber Surveillance in
the Service of
Truth". In this book, Patrick Jaulent, Doctor of
Electronics and
Expert in Strategy and Cyber Security, explains how the so-called
Covid-19
pandemic, in addition to being the project of a planetary genocide as
several
scientists have already demonstrated, is also a very juicy business for
the
hospitals. This text is a transcript of an interview with the
courageous
journalist Richard Boutry. We advise you to read it
in its entirety, as
well as the other very interesting articles that you will find on the
website www.mcreveil.org.
Richard
Boutry: Ladies
and gentlemen, good
morning and welcome to France-Soir's programme,
Le Défi de la Vérité,
with, as you will see today, a distinguished guest, an extremely
courageous
man. Patrick Jaulent, good morning.
Patrick
Jaulent: Hello
Richard.
Richard
Boutry: You
are a doctor who
graduated from one of the most prestigious American universities, and
you were
director of decryption at one of the biggest American cyber security
companies.
You are going to talk to us for almost half an hour about this crisis,
with, as
you will see, and here I am really addressing the public, some enormous
revelations at the end. So first of all, why this book?
Patrick
Jaulent: Why
this book, Richard? I
am angry. I'm angry because the active, young people have been
sacrificed for
old people like me. I'm angry because I'm being forced to get
vaccinated, even
though I don't want to. I am angry because there is a president, let's
be
clear, who does not know how to talk to young people. The only thing he
proposes is to reimburse a visit to a shrink. I'm angry and I support
this,
because my generation, a golden generation, which didn't experience the
war, it
is a generation which retired at 60, which was able to buy property
when it was
possible, it's a generation which is privileged. And we're going to
screw up,
let's speak vulgarly, young people and active people, for a generation
like me.
So at some point, a certain number of things have to be revealed. The
truth has
to come out.
Richard
Boutry: This
truth really comes out
in your book, which is extremely incriminating, "Un
Monde de
Menteurs (A World of Liars)", which you have
self-edited, and you
will understand, the public, why he has not found a publisher. In fact
you are
in a way the new Snowden, one can say?
Patrick
Jaulent: I
hope I don't end up like
him.
Richard
Boutry: In
any case, you, who were
in cyber security, can say it today, and state it very clearly: 80% of
the
information circulating on the internet today is fake news, but not in
the
sense that we understand it today, or at least in the sense that the
government
understands it today.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Absolutely, there is faked
news, I would say, that is deliberate, we will have the opportunity to
talk
about it. My role is essentially, in all this fake news, to look at
what is
true. So everything I'm going to tell, apart from the agency that knows
about
the programme, that knows about the book, everything I'm going to tell
exists
on the internet. What is needed is simply to have the time to look for
this
information and to make sure that it is good. That's my job.
Richard
Boutry: So,
you have the privilege
of knowing and mastering cyber security better than anyone else, and I
think we
can really say that; you get into the mechanisms of the system, but
also you
have this ability, of course, being bilingual, to be able to translate
official
documents that are a bit lost on the Internet and that you really
manage to get
them stand out.
Patrick
Jaulent: Yes,
I'll tell you, I'll
tell you a secret, I've even taken up Chinese.
Richard
Boutry: That
you are now speaking
at what level?
Patrick
Jaulent: At
a very average level,
but I took up Chinese because at some point, I had to start looking at
Chinese
sites, and I had to manage and try to sort through all these series of
information, the city of Wuhan has a particular site, and there are
things that
went on from October 2018, 2019 and 2020, on this site of the city of
Wuhan,
and I absolutely wanted to immerse myself in the Chinese culture to try
to look
a little bit at what was true and false because indeed these are people
who
manipulate, I would say, the true and false.
Richard
Boutry: So,
among all the
revelations that you are going to make, and here we are really getting
to the
heart of the matter, there is a very precise point, a precise date: it
is 2003,
when this virus, and no one knows this in France, already existed in
China, in
a slightly different form, but it is almost the same: SARS.
Patrick
Jaulent: Indeed,
this famous breathing
syndrome that causes serious consequences for humans existed in 2003 in
China
and Hong Kong, but if we want to be completely exhaustive, it affected
about
ten countries. The number of deaths was small compared to what we know
today.
Around a thousand deaths. That is nothing. SARS appeared in February
2003, I
believe, and everything stopped in July 2003. Without vaccination.
Richard
Boutry: Without
vaccination. It
stopped on its own.
Patrick
Jaulent: It
stopped on its own
because there had been a certain number of barrier measures as we are
talking
about today, which had been announced by the WHO, because the WHO knew
about
this virus and the barrier measures were classic, we wore masks, we
washed our
hands, we used the distance, and we cleaned up everywhere we went. So
it had
nothing to do with the virus we know today, but it was already a first
symptom
of what could happen one day.
Richard
Boutry: That's
it, with PCR tests
that were also carried out at the time and tests that were useless.
Patrick
Jaulent: If
you look at the WHO
website and click on the date 2003, you will notice a message in French
and
English, and I say it bluntly: Be careful with PCR tests,
they tend to cause
false positives or false negatives. This is 2003.
Richard
Boutry: This
is 2003. Then you have
the EcoHealth Alliance, which is an American company that was already
working
with the Chinese on gain-of-function. I think it's very important for
viewers
that you explain what exactly gain-of-function are.
Patrick
Jaulent: I
propose that we take a
little trip into the past so that we can understand the evolution of
this
pandemic. So we're going to go back in time; on 31 December 2019, China
informs
a WHO agency in Beijing that they have identified a new type of virus,
SARS, in
the city of Wuhan. Wuhan is a major city, with a population of 9
million
inhabitants, 11 million I would say with the suburbs, 5 major
hospitals, we
will talk about this later, and high-level universities in medicine,
agriculture and science. So, China is warning that a new virus has been
detected.
Richard
Boutry: This
is taken up by
the WHO a few days later.
Patrick
Jaulent: So
it's taken up on the
31st. The WHO publishes this information on its website on 2nd
or 3rd
January 2020, and we know that the WHO declares a global pandemic on 11
March
2020. So what happened, what justified this? When we look at what
happened, we
see that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had already been working on
SARS-type
viruses since at least 2015. Why do we know this is since 2015? Because
since
2015 there have been research publications and what we discovered in
these
publications is that there is an American university, called the
University of
Chapel Hill, which is publishing research together. But you mentioned
the
EcoHealth Alliance. The big lie is that there has been a partnership
with the
Wuhan Institute of Virology and an American institute for several years
working
on the gain-of-function of these famous viruses and this is what they
call Eco
Alliance.
Richard
Boutry: So
what are the
gain-of-function for the general public?
Patrick
Jaulent: We're
going to talk again
about gain-of-function. This company is a non-profit company, which
receives
money from the Obama presidency and from the Trump presidency. So what
is a
gain-of-function? A gain-of-function is giving a pathogenic gene, a
pathogenic
element the possibility to become more virulent than more virulent,
more deadly
than more deadly. You take a virus, you manipulate it, and you make it
more
deadly, and on top of that, you make it a virus that can be spread in
the air.
You make it gain function. You give it extra functions, extra deadly
functions.
Can you imagine that?
Richard
Boutry: So,
what you're saying
here, in fact, I'm trying to translate for the viewers, is that,
according to
you, very clearly, it's a deliberate decision by Man to create this
virus to
exterminate the planet.
Patrick
Jaulent:
I don't know if it's to
exterminate the planet, we'll see later, but it's part of a deliberate
operation by Man, and all the more deliberate because when you scratch
the
surface, there's the American company Eco Alliance, which has been
working for
years on these gain-of-function, essentially since 2017. And why 2017?
Because
it is from 2017 that the Wuhan Virology Institute is labelled P4.
Before, it
was not labelled P4. P4 means P for pathogen, 4 means you are handling
deadly
viruses, very deadly for humans. That's P4.
Richard
Boutry:
And it must be said that
this is a laboratory that was visited at the time by François Hollande
and a
whole French delegation.
Patrick
Jaulent: Well,
better than that!
It's a laboratory that was provided by France to China, that was
inaugurated in
2017, by the Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve, that was inaugurated by
the
Minister of Health, Marisol Touraine, that was inaugurated by Yves
Levy, the
husband of the future Minister of Health, and that was inaugurated by
Mr Raoult
who is the general manager of the BioMérieux P4 laboratory in Lyon. So
France
knows what is going on inside. Can you believe it?
Richard
Boutry:
Today we really have the
impression that, at the beginning of the year, so a year and a half ago
now,
the President of the Republic suddenly discovered the existence of this
virus,
but everyone had already known about it, as you say, perhaps for
months, since
October, in any case, probably also for years, since 2015.
Patrick
Jaulent: Since
2015, there are
communications that are available on the net, that are public, that
show very
clearly that they are manipulating a certain number of viruses, so
initially,
SARS number 1, SARS number 2, then links with the bat, and from 2017,
2018, I
will give you the explanation of 2018 later, they are increasing the
mortality
of viruses through gain-of-function. This is what they are doing. They
are
playing with this, and even more so in 2018, we are sure of 2018
because in
2018 the American embassy in China is sending alarmist messages to the
American
authorities: Be careful, we don't know what is going on in
the Wuhan
virology institute, but we are on the verge of a global SARS pandemic.
Encrypted messages from the US embassy sent to US authorities, first
quarter
2018. Evidence.
Richard
Boutry: There
are also tests being
carried out in parallel in the Netherlands. You can tell us about this
because
it is very important and the public is not aware of it, based in
particular on
animal faeces and therefore carried by birds. What is that exactly?
Patrick
Jaulent: Indeed,
this is information
that is difficult to find on the net, but it is possible to find the
links on
the net, and that is that there have been trials, and there are trials,
which
have been carried out in the Netherlands. The virus, after having had
its
additional gain-of-function, its additional mortality, they wanted to
test what
it gave, they infected birds, they released them in a field of cows and
all the
cows died. The virus was really good. They did a great job. They added
some
extra gain-of-function to it. So why did they do that?
Richard
Boutry: If
that's the case, then
who benefits from the crime?
Patrick
Jaulent:
So, let's go back to the
different actors in this morbid scene.
Richard
Boutry:
We're practically in a
James Bond movie here.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Yes, it's 2019, China
informs that a new virus has been detected, a global pandemic is
triggered, and
we realise that an American company, which is closely linked to the
Wuhan
Institute of Virology, which is working together on gain-of-function,
is
increasing the mortality of the virus. And we realise that it is very
dangerous. The American embassy informs the authorities, and we realise
that
Dr. Antony Fauci, the American health doctor, the doctor who is
responsible,
who is the director of the Institute of Infection in the United States,
NIAID
...
Richard
Boutry:
Local virology. He is
investing at this time.
Patrick
Jaulent:
The American embassy in
China is informed that "Beware, we don't know what's going on
in Wuhan
at the virology institute, beware there are risks ..."
Nevertheless,
he validates a contract of 3.1 million dollars to continue the work.
Richard
Boutry:
So he encourages that.
Patrick
Jaulent:
And he encourages it all
the more because he puts 600,000 dollars of his own money into the
Wuhan
laboratories. Not only are they informed that it is dangerous...
instead of
saying stop, they sign a 3.1 million dollar contract and put in
additional
money. Why have they returned to this level? Why this link? Why did
China
develop this kind of thing? It's because the US in 2004 said no more
gain-of-function.
In 2015, they said no more gain-of-function. The gain-of-function that
were
manipulated in Fort Detrick and so many others, they said it's too
dangerous,
they said stop. Well, they say stop here, but they are going to make it
elsewhere.
Richard
Boutry:
That's why they made it in
China. So in parallel, there is a war, in fact a world war, it was a
bit of a
race against time, there was a space war for a while, between the
Americans and
the Russians, and there was also a war with the Islamists. Can you
explain why?
Because it also fits into this framework. They needed to be the best, the
most
powerful, and to have a bomb that would be of global reach before
anyone else,
in a way.
Patrick
Jaulent:
You are right, Richard.
All the intelligence services know that the Islamic state has
experimented with
animal pathogens. All the intelligence services know this. So much so
that
Mohamed Abrini, one of those responsible for the 2015 Paris attacks,
was caught
with a bag containing animal faeces and testicles. And that, the French
intelligence services know that. So this is not new to them. They say
to
themselves that the Islamic State is making some experiments, and that
they
have to be ahead of the game. I imagine that this is what it's all
about,
without revealing secrets that are a bit tricky to put on air.
Richard
Boutry:
Yes, we understand that,
and the viewers know it. Because you have written another book, which
is off
the record for the moment, but which tells us more or less everything
you know
today, and this is just a teaser, as we say in the business. What is
very
interesting to see is that on the spot, in Wuhan, Harvard really
discovered
extremely important information seen by satellite, almost two months
before.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Exactly, that is to say that
when we look at it, effectively the virus was discovered in December, a
few
days before, that's what we see on the internet, that's what is
broadcast in
the media. Yes, but the problem is that there is the broadcast on the
Harvard
website, it still exists, just look at the link, the broadcast of
satellite
photos of the 5 main hospitals in the city of Wuhan, which were totally
saturated. That is, when you compare what happened, and this is
mid-October
2019, when you compare what happened a week before, and when you
compare what
happened a year before, and Harvard counted the number of vehicles, ...
Richard
Boutry:
The ratio of 200 to 600...
Patrick
Jaulent: That's
it, from 200 to 600,
over the 5 hospitals.
Richard
Boutry:
So there is a human tide that
went for treatment at that time.
Patrick
Jaulent:
So we suppose that there
was a human tide that took place during the first 15 days of October.
And this
is all the more true because when we do research, we see that at that
same
period, there was a search on the internet for key words such as
influenza,
such as temperature, etc. This shows that for a while, they
didn't know
what was going on. But you can't say that the virus was discovered in
December,
or even a few months before.
Richard
Boutry:
So basically, what you're
saying, I'm caricaturing a bit, is that Wuhan was having fun, in a way,
manoeuvring with these viruses, and that one day or another we knew
that it
would come out.
Patrick
Jaulent:
We knew it would come out.
If you play with matches, you end up setting things on fire. And during
that
period, what happened with France? It's interesting. France chartered a
military plane that left from the east of France on 31 December 2019,
which is
the same time as the WHO announcement... And from a time difference
point of
view, it doesn't work because they sent the plane before. So they sent
a
military plane to pick up French personnel who were in Wuhan before the
WHO
officially announced that. And they sent two other planes, I would say
"civilian",
which left from Istres.
Richard
Boutry:
And among the passengers
on the return journey, one died.
Patrick
Jaulent:
So wait. Indeed, it came
to the Craie base, the military base, it was confined. When the
military plane
arrived, it was confined. There were 10 people who were confined. It is
important to know that the first person to die in France was a Chinese
man in
his early eighties, and that the first French person to die was in the
Oise
region, not far from the base.
Richard
Boutry:
OK, so that's the first of
the big scandals you denounce in this book "A World of Liars".
Now, let's talk about the figures, because it's extremely interesting,
before
talking about funding and Bill Gates. In the USA, you were able to
delve into
the figures on what a Covid patient could bring in to the hospitals. Do
you
have any information to give us publicly on this France-Soir programme "Le
défi de la vérité", on that level? How much the hospital earn
for a
Covid diagnostic? How much the hospital earn for a Covid patient? How
much the
hospital earn for a Covid dead person?
Patrick
Jaulent:
So this element is public;
an investigation was carried out by investigative journalists from USA
Today.
So I went to retrieve the information, I contacted that journalist to
make sure
that the information was true. It's different from one state to
another. The
pattern is as follows: You're identified as a "Covid
Contact
Case", you go into the hospital, the hospital gets $50 in this state,
in
the other state they get $100. You use a ventilator, the hospital gets
$300.
Unfortunately, you die in this hospital, the hospital gets 4,000
dollars.
Richard
Boutry:
Conclusion for you, there
has been euthanasia, can we use the word?
Patrick
Jaulent:
I don't know if there was
euthanasia, but in any case what has been proven, and what I know, is
that
there was a bid to turn the hospital into a cash machine.
Richard
Boutry:
Which means everything...
And, forgive me for asking this question, but the public is asking it,
you are
talking about the United States, but in France?
Patrick
Jaulent:
I'm very embarrassed
Richard to answer that.
Richard
Boutry:
I understand, because you
have to know that the gentleman I have in front of me receives threats
all the
time and it is an extremely courageous act, believe me, to come here,
on the
set, to reveal all these things today, so I won't ask you for more,
even if
through your answer we manage to detect a certain number of things...
that's
the least we can say. So, another revelation that you make in the book
is about
vaccines.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Excuse me Richard, I would
like to come back to the figures, because the figures speak for
themselves. We
hear "There are 3,000 deaths", "4,000 hospitalizations",
things like that and so on. How does it work in practice? It's
incredible that
before Covid, a death certificate had only one line: The cause of
death. "I
died of an overdose", "I died of cancer" with
the
definition of the type of cancer, "I died of a firearm",
...
that was before Covid.
Richard
Boutry:
They changed the wording.
Patrick
Jaulent:
After Covid, with the WHO
guidelines, a line was added. They said: "You died of an
overdose and
you had Covid." You died "with",
but you died of an
overdose. And the totality of these figures, whether you died of an
overdose
"with" Covid or not, is totalled in the number of deaths.
Richard
Boutry: That's
right. So they
inflated the numbers completely arbitrarily.
Patrick
Jaulent:
So the figures have been
inflated, and I will go even further than that, because there is
evidence that
I have been able to verify myself by visiting certain hospitals. If a
person
dies on the floor where Covid is treated, his death certificate will
say
"died of Covid", whereas he came in and died of cancer, but he was on
a floor where Covid was treated, tests were being carried out and
things like
that.
Richard
Boutry:
We'll talk about that in a
few moments when we talk about communication in this area. The other
revelation, as I said earlier, is about vaccines. Indeed, we talk about
vaccination, the success rate of all these vaccines that are coming out
and
that you all know, the three or four main ones that are on the market
at the
moment in France, we talk about a success rate in the press of 94 to
95%, it
works very well. So you have information to give us, because in fact
the
figures that are put forward are not available today. They are not
public, it
takes someone like you who knows cyber security by heart and at an
incredible
level to be able to find them. What are these real figures?
Patrick
Jaulent:
So if you look, it's true
that there are advertising messages from the main vaccine
manufacturers, not to
mention Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Moderna, AstraZeneca. Moderna
assures 95%
success of its vaccine, a few days later it assures 100%. Johnson has a
90%
success rate. I want to. The question I ask myself is: Where do these
figures
come from? Where does this 90% come from and based on what? "Oh
no, we
can't do that, it's confidential." Well, is it confidential?
But why
is it confidential? How did you come up with the 95%? So I did a bit of
scratching. I stumbled upon papers that show that in reality, the
efficiency is
much lower, without announcing figures, than what is announced.
Richard
Boutry:
And what you also denounce
in the book, which is very interesting because you talk about vaccines,
is
first of all the rather opaque financing behind it, because there are
indeed
quite a few leading politicians who have invested in these vaccines.
Patrick
Jaulent:
In all the companies that
make vaccines, except the Russian Sputnik vaccine, I would say that
Bill Gates
has put money.
Richard
Boutry:
Including in Chinese
companies.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Including in Acino Pharma.
Richard
Boutry:
Because there are three
Chinese vaccines.
Patrick
Jaulent:
There are three Chinese
vaccines; including in the three Chinese manufactures. I would say that
to be
very clear, in the Moderna company, Bill Gates has put 10 million
dollars.
Richard
Boutry:
What we can say is that
Bill Gates has taken a stake in all these vaccines, except the Russian
one.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Except for Russian. To my
knowledge, I have no information about the Russians. He put money into
Moderna,
he put money into Johnson and Johnson, he put money into AstraZeneca,
he put
money into at least one Chinese company.
Richard
Boutry:
All these companies had
pots and pans before, the ones you were talking about.
Patrick
Jaulent: Except
for Moderna. We will
talk about Moderna in particular. All these companies have a lot of
baggage. If
you ask me, Richard, "Why don't you get a vaccine Patrick?"
First of all, these are the only companies that make products that
they're not
responsible for. I get the vaccine, I have a problem, who do I go to?
Well,
they do! They are not responsible. I go to the European Community,
which will
reimburse me. Why don't I get vaccinated? When I look at all the mess
they are
in, ...
Richard
Boutry:
There are also insurance
companies. Do insurance companies not reimburse?
Patrick
Jaulent:
The insurance companies
will say to you: "Listen, we're having trouble reimbursing you
for a
vaccine that is being tested." We'll talk about it. The
vaccines are being
tested.
Richard
Boutry:
Phase 2, not phase 3.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Phase 2, part of phase 2.
Phase 2 on Pfizer ends in July 2021. We are not yet in July 2021, which
is the
end of phase 2. But this is on the company's website, I'm not making it
up.
Richard
Boutry:
And you were talking about
Moderna.
Patrick
Jaulent:
As far as Moderna is
concerned, it is a very fine company.
Richard
Boutry:
Run by a Frenchman.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Who attended the Ecole
Centrale de Paris, who is on the list of billionaires. So the Moderna
company,
by the way the name Moderna comes from what? Modernise the RNA, means
"Modernise the RNA" - "I want to modernise the RNA". That's
where the name comes from. It's always important to look at the
etymology of
names. Moderna was created in 2010.
Richard
Boutry:
He had no previous
experience in this field.
Patrick
Jaulent:
No history, no background
in this business. In 2018, they submitted an application to join the
New York
Stock Exchange. When you join the New York Stock Exchange, the New York
Stock
Exchange's regulator, the SEC, comes to analyse the file.
Richard
Boutry:
It was refused.
Patrick
Jaulent:
He analyses the dossier,
and the report, which is also available on the internet, says: "Look,
the
level of risk at product level is very important. You haven't even done
animal
testing. We don't know what RNA means, review your copy." So first it's
rejected. We come back, then it's accepted. I took the file, which is
267 pages
long in English, and in the evenings, I read the pages to look at them.
And I came
across a page where Moderna in 2018 has privileged partnerships with a
company
called AstraZeneca. So I say, "But what do you mean, they work
together?" But they have been working together for years Mr. Jaulent.
Oh,
really! But it is even noted in the official document of the stock
exchange.
Has partnerships with DARPA, the American military research centre, and
has
partnerships with the Bill Gates and Melinda Gates Foundation.
So
I say, but it's an interesting
thing. When I get the vaccine from Moderna, is it AstraZeneca or
something
else? What are the partnerships? It's 2018, it's not 2019. But the
partnership
still exists. Let's go a little further on Moderna, and since you asked
me
about the vaccines. It's early 2020. On 11 January, and this is marked
on the
company's website, on the development cycle of Moderna's vaccine, there
is a
small box that says: "The Chinese provided us with the
genome, the
genomic sequence of Covid. And thanks to the Chinese, we were able,
three days
later, to create our own genome, and three months later, to release
phase 1 of
the vaccines." Ah, the Chinese are really nice. They are very
nice.
Richard
Boutry:
They gave it to them as a
welcome gift.
Patrick
Jaulent:
That's right. Especially
since they manufacture vaccines themselves.
Richard
Boutry:
So they are competitors
after all, and so they would deliver the quintessence of their
knowledge to the
competition.
Patrick
Jaulent:
It's marked on their site,
and it's always marked on their site. Then, on 11 January, I look on
the WHO
website, and it's confirmed on 11 January. But I look, who donates the
most to
the WHO? It's Bill Gates.
Richard
Boutry: 70%
of the WHO's budget is
Bill Gates.
Patrick
Jaulent:
Who put the most money
into Moderna? It was Bill Gates. So the date of the 11th, I don't
believe it. I
go to the White House, and I come across communications from Mike
Pompeo, the
Secretary of State, who says: "It's April 22, 2020, the Chinese aren't
playing ball, they still haven't provided us with the virus genome, we
don't
know how to do anything." So who to believe? There are those who say
"we have the genome, we can make it, we are the 11." And there's the
Secretary of State, who says "Look, on April 22, I didn't receive
anything, and in July, I still haven't received anything."
Richard
Boutry: So
who is lying in the
case?
Patrick
Jaulent:
In any case, I am a
population. So all the tinkering, I was going to say the internal
scheming, I
don't want to hear about it. What I want to do is to know whether I
should
trust this type of vaccine.
Richard
Boutry:
That's it, and that's why
you wrote this book: "A World of Liars: Cyber
Surveillance at the
service of the Truth". We are basically being lied
to. We are lied
to about everything. 80% of the information today, which circulates on
the
internet, the so-called "official" information, is, according to you,
false. So, let's go back to Bill Gates for a moment, because Bill Gates
has
invested in these companies, and for his own interests, and at the same
time,
he invests enormously; and that's what's very interesting; in
communication.
Because he also had to master communication completely. We know that he
invested in Le Monde, but not only in Le Monde. Le Monde in France is
worth 2
million euros, in any case between 1 million 4 and 2 million, but more
like 2
million visibly, and for the rest, can you give us the list of
newspapers in
which he invested?
Patrick
Jaulent:
So, I'll be doing a book
on Bill Gates. It is planned. I'm trying to decide whether to tell the
whole
story. Bill Gates has invested in all the laboratories, whether it's
Merck,
whether it's Novartis, whether it's AstraZeneca, whether it's Johnson
and
Johnson, whether it's Moderna and others. He invests hundreds of
millions of
dollars. Bill Gates, for a number of reasons, has controlled the press
and the
media. He has donated to Le Monde, to Al Jazeera as a newspaper, to the
BBC, to
The Guardian, to the European School of Journalism. Why did he do this?
Richard
Boutry: Training
the journalists of
tomorrow.
Patrick
Jaulent: Why?
As I have a slightly
misplaced mind, it depends on how I get up, I said to myself, with
this, the
newspaper Le Monde is not going to do a bad article on Bill Gates.
Richard
Boutry: And
then he also invested
in quite a few Eastern European newspapers. I think that, as my
grandmother
used to say, the cup is full after all the important information you
have just
given us. We're not going to say any more because we have to keep the
suspense
going so that the viewers can read your book. In any case, we spent
more than
half an hour in your company, which is already enormous. I thank you
very much
for having come very bravely, and I say it loud and clear, because
there are
not many people like you who dare to say all that on the air in our
country,
and in live conditions. It's not just Covid, perhaps we'll have the
opportunity
to come back on this channel or another to talk about it. Thank you
very much
for coming, Patrick Jaulent. Thank you, viewers, for having followed us.
[End
of the interview]
Dear
friends, you understand more and
more that the world is ruled by the sons of the devil, who have as
their
working tools lies and wickedness. In the various teachings we have
already
made available to you, we have clearly laid bare the true nature of the
demons
who rule this world, and all the satanic projects they have for mission
to
accomplish. It is up to you not to fall into their traps. If instead of
submitting to God the Creator of the world, you submit to the demons
who
destroy the world, you will regret it.
Know
that after this life on earth,
there is eternal life. This is why the agents of satan are so agitated.
Their
mission is to turn all men away from the true God, in order to lead
them to
Hell. The various revelations explaining this subject in detail are
available
free of charge on the website www.mcreveil.org. Make the effort to read
them,
for your salvation and even for your general knowledge.
Grace
to all who love our Lord Jesus
Christ with an undying love!
Dear brothers and sisters,
If you have run away from fake churches and would like to know what to do, here are the two options available to you:
1- See if around you there are some other children of God who fear God and desire to live according to the Sound Doctrine. If you find any, feel free to join them.
2- If you do not find one and wish to join us, our doors are open to you. The only thing we will ask you to do is to first read all the Teachings that the Lord has given us, and which are on our website www.mcreveil.org, to reassure yourself that they are in conformity with the Bible. If you find them in accordance with the Bible, and are ready to submit to Jesus Christ, and live by the demands of His word, we will gladly welcome you.
The grace of the Lord Jesus be with you!
Source & Contact:
Website: https://www.mcreveil.org
E-mail: mail@mcreveil.org
Click here to download this Book in PDF
Click here to download this Book in MP3
