This Book is free of charge and can in no way constitute a source of business.
You are free to copy this Book for your preaching, or for distribution, or also for your Evangelism on Social Media, provided that its content is not modified or altered in any way, and that the website mcreveil.org is cited as the source.
Woe to you, greedy agents of satan who will try to market these teachings and testimonies!
Woe to you, sons of satan who like to publish these teachings and testimonies on Social Media while hiding the address of the website www.mcreveil.org, or falsifying their contents!
Know that you can escape the justice system of men, but you certainly will not escape the judgment of God.
You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to Hell? Matthew 23:33
Nota Bene
This Book is regularly updated. We recommend that you download the latest version from www.mcreveil.org.
C
MEDICINE: AN ORGANIZED GENOCIDE
(Updated on 01 01 2024)
Dear
brothers and dear friends, we
would like to put at your disposal another story as true as the ones we
have
shared with you in the past about the dangerousness of C Medicine. Do
not waste
time going into medical dictionaries to search the expression C
Medicine. You
will not find any. C Medicine is simply this medicine that kills you
voluntarily, consciously, and deliberately, giving you the impression
of
healing you. It is this medicine that the agents of the devil who
govern the
earth impose on the whole world, to satisfy their dark and sinister
interests.
For the sake of ethics, these criminals give this medicine the
deceptive label
of "Conventional Medicine", whereas the real label should be
"Chemical Medicine" or "Criminal Medicine". You have now
understood what C Medicine is. Yes, you have understood, C as
Conventional, C
as Chemical, C as Criminal.
The
story that we propose below is
that of a doctor who has had all the problems of the world, ranging
from prison
to the removal from the Medical Register. His mistake was to have
naively
believed that conventional medicine was intended to cure patients. His
crime is
that of having worked in the direction of curing cancer, and his
misfortune is
to have succeeded precisely in curing all the cancer patients who have
come to
him, by his simple and natural method, thus depriving the genocidal of
the
pharmaceutical cartels of many customers.
The
German doctor Ryke Geerd Hamer,
since he is the one we are talking about, has discovered that cancer
can be
cured, and has demonstrated his discovery by irrefutable scientific
evidence.
He went so far as to advise his cancer patients to stop all
chemotherapy, all
radiotherapy, and all surgery, and he practically cured them all by his
method.
We invite you to discover his story through the narrative below, which
is in
fact the transcription of the documentary "Seul contre tous" (One
Against All) shot in his honour by the film
director Jean-Jacques
Crèvecœur. The story is in two parts.
Prison
Fleury Mérogis (Paris region),
January 2006. The largest prison in Europe. An average of 6000
detainees stay
there. It should be said: 6000 inmates are languishing. On many
occasions, this
prison has been blamed for its inhuman detention conditions. In the
heart of
this prison hell, for 16 months, a man suffers the worst humiliations
on daily
basis, the harassment of guards and prisoners, bullying, abuse, not to
mention
taunts about his lack of knowledge of the French language. What do you
want?
It's a German, a "Boche" as
it is referred to in France.
This
man, this "criminal" kept in the
high security district is called
Hamer, Dr. Hamer. Hamer, that means hammer. Dr. Hammer, another
opportunity to
make fun of him. In a few months, in May 2006, he will be 71 years old.
His
crime, the one for which it is right and proper that he pays, is to
have
incited through his writings the "illegal" exercise of medicine.
Anyway, it is what is written on the order of his judgment.
In
reality, his fault is to have
declared that cancer could be cured and not fought.
The problem is that he
has proven it scientifically. His
folly, because you have to be
Hammer to do that, is
to have advised his cancer patients to stop all chemotherapy, all
radiotherapy, all surgery in other to fight their terrible disease.
Another
problem is that he has practically cured all of them. His
unconsciousness is to
have stood up to the entire scientific establishment and the
medical-pharmaceutical lobbies. Yet another problem is that he alone
explained
what thousands of researchers had failed to unravel despite the
billions of
dollars invested in medical research.
Since
1981, for 25 years, against all
odds, against all comers, "Einer gegen alle" as he says in his
autobiography published in 2004 just before entering prison, one against all...
One
against all, and yet during the
winter of 2005-2006, 3 women set up their caravan at the entrance to
his prison
distributing leaflets every morning to the guards and supervisors of
Fleury
Mérogis. From time to time, they returned to the heart of Paris, trying
to
awaken sleeping consciences. But how could the fate of a dangerous
charlatan be
of any interest to the whole world? "Justice
has done its job, stay clear, there is nothing left to see."
One
against all, and yet in 18 months,
between September 2004 and February 2006, date of his release, several
thousand
letters of testimony, of support and of protest were sent to many
leaders and
politicians, especially the French and German.
One
against all, and yet everywhere in
France, Italy, Spain, Germany, demonstrations of support were organized
in
favour of the work of Dr. Hamer and his release. For example, here in
Tübingen,
a German city in Upper Bavaria located a little south of Stuttgart, a
peaceful
demonstration that wants to protest against a scientific power haloed
with its
arrogant certainty. A down-to-earth event that contrasts with the
extreme
violence of the facts which have been dragging on for 25 years with
impunity.
That day they had come from all over Germany, from Austria,
Switzerland, Italy,
and France to demonstrate in front of the faculty of medicine at the
University
of Tübingen. Among the demonstrators were medical doctors, homeopaths,
naturopaths, psychotherapists, but also many patients who have been
cured
naturally of their cancer thanks to the work of Dr. Hamer. Here and
there,
fathers and mothers claiming freedom of therapeutic choices for
themselves and
their children. Their claim, the official recognition of the New
Germanic
Medicine, the theory resulting from the works of Dr. Hamer.
This
is not the first time in history
that a scientist has been persecuted for defending theories that upset
the
beliefs and interests of his epoch. For many of his sympathizers, the
Hamer
case furiously reminds them of another case that has long echoed in
minds
committed to truth and freedom. It was in 1633, 350 years before the
Hamer
case.
The
one who was sentenced was called
Galileo Galilei. At that time, the conception of the universe was based
on the
natural philosophy of Aristotle (384-322 BC) which put the planet earth
at the
centre of the world. It was in the 4th century before Christ. Later,
Ptoleme
(90-168) proposed in the 2nd century AD, a geocentric model of the
solar
system. This model was accepted as a reference in the Western and Arab
worlds
for more than 1400 years. He even explained, thanks to a very
complicated
model, why most planets had seemingly retrograde movements. This
geocentric
vision was supported by the clergy of Rome as being the only one
compatible
with the Christian faith. In any case, the Council of Trent had decreed
around
the 1550s that the interpretation of the scientific results was
incumbent on
the church alone. Moreover, the pope had attributed to the most famous
university of the time, the Roman college run by Jesuits, the monopoly
of
scientific interpretations. Yet this geocentric approach stuck less and
less to
the reality of observations that were becoming more numerous. Among
them, the
movement of solar spots, the phases of the moon and Venus, the
observation of the
satellites of Jupiter. All this no longer became compatible with the
theory of
geocentrism.
At
the same time as the Council of
Trent, Copernicus, a canon, doctor, and Polish astronomer, proposed a
heliocentric model of the solar system. This model had the enormous
advantage
of greatly simplifying the explanations for the apparent motions of the
planets. But Copernicus had been careful not to publish his works
except on his
deathbed, well aware that his scientific conclusions would be fiercely
opposed
by the religious and scientific power in place. Rome was not mistaken
in
accepting only his theory as a working hypothesis, and not as a
scientifically
established truth.
60
years later, Kepler, a German
astronomer from the Stuttgart region, studied and confirmed
Copernicus's
heliocentric theory. For him, not only did the planets revolve around
the sun,
but he calculated that their trajectory was not circular, but slightly
elliptical. Kepler's laws were so precise that later they served as a
basis for
Newton's theories on universal gravitation, theories still valid in the
twenty-first century. But Kepler also had the prudence to remain
discreet about
his discoveries.
At
the same time as Kepler, an Italian
physicist and astronomer by the name of Galileo (1564-1642), laid the
foundations of classical mechanics. In the same movement, he devotes
himself
body and soul to the stubborn defence of the works of Copernicus and
Kepler. It
was this attitude that was fatal to him.
We
are in Tübingen at the end of the
60s. At that time, Geerd Hamer is one of the most renowned oncologists
in
Germany. Head of the oncology department of the university hospital
specialized
in women's cancers, he receives women from all over Europe. Creative
genius, he
filed several patents for medical inventions including a revolutionary
scalpel
still used today in cosmetic surgery. Everything work out for him, he
is
immensely rich; he is recognized by his patients and his peers; he
lives a
happy life with his wife Sigrid, also a doctor, and their four children.
A
decade or so later, this life of
happiness and success suddenly changes. His 19-year-old son Dirk spent
a
peaceful vacation with his older sister Birgit and a few friends. The
night of
August 17 to 18, 1978, on the island of Cavallo off the coast of
Corsica, he is
seriously injured in the femoral artery and in the abdomen by a bullet
fired by
prince Victor-Emmanuel of Savoy, son of the last king of Italy. Victor
Emmanuel
of Savoy is arrested immediately. He is remanded in a prison in Corsica
Ajaccio
for 6 weeks. Despite a guilty plea signed by him, the prince of Italy
will
never be condemned thereafter for his act. Meanwhile, Dirk is admitted
into
emergency care clinically dead. After resuscitation in extremis and a
first
operation to stop the bleeding, they are compelled to amputate his
right leg.
After 110 days of suffering and 19 surgeries, Dirk died in his father's
arms on
7 December 1978 at the Heidelberg Hospital. Dr. Geerd Hamer is 43 years
old. He
will describe this day as the darkest of his life. Sigrid is as
devastated as
he is. They have just lost what they had most precious: the flesh of
their
flesh.
Three
months later, Geerd is diagnosed
with testicular cancer and Sigrid with ovarian cancer. After two
surgeries
carried out quickly, Geerd resumes work. For him, the appearance of the
same
cancer in his wife and in him is not a coincidence. It must be related
to the
sudden loss of their child. From there, systematically, Dr. Hamer
questions
each of his patients with cancer. He was hoping at the very most 30 to
40
percent of responses that linked the emotional shock to the onset of
their
cancer. Imagine his surprise when he found that all said they had
suffered in
the weeks or months before, a brutal and intense shock that put them in
a state
of blockage and over-stress.
Between
1979 and 1981, Hamer collected
the testimony of 6,500 cancer patients. From these testimonies and from
the
analyses he makes of them, he draws all the more surprising conclusions
that he
verifies them in 100% of cases, which has never been the case in
medicine
before him.
First
conclusion:
The cancer of a particular organ always results from the same type of
emotional
shock. The same organ is always connected to the same emotional
feeling. This
allows him to establish a precise mapping of each cancer in relation to
the
shocks felt. He observed, for example, that the left breast cancer in a
right-handed woman is always caused by what he calls a nest conflict in
relation to a child, real or virtual. Testicular or ovarian cancer is
related
to a sudden loss conflict. As for bone cancer for example, it is always
triggered by a serious conflict of devaluation.
Second
conclusion:
He manages to visualise on the scanners of the brain the trace of the
over-stress caused by the emotional shock. He thus discovers that each
type of
shock always corresponds to the same area of the brain, which is always
in
relation with the same organ. That's what he checks. In the same
examples as
before, nest conflict manifests itself as a focus in the right lateral
cerebellum, loss conflict in the occipital part of the brain, while
bone cancer
in the marrow of the brain. Thus, the precise and careful examination
of a
brain scan allows Dr. Hamer to determine with certainty which organ is
affected
by the cancer.
Third
conclusion:
These correlations in triads between the psychic shock, the cerebral
zone and
the affected organ not only prove that the disease is not triggered by
chance,
but also that its development is entirely controlled by the brain.
From
there, Hamer tests with his
volunteer patients a new therapeutic approach. His reasoning is as
follows: If
a brutal shock generates a traumatic emotional feeling, and if this
feeling
triggers in the brain the start of a biological program called a
disease, then
if one resolves the situation which is the origin of the shock, and or
if the
emotional trauma associated with it is solved, the brain should
logically
command and control the regression of this same disease. This is what
he
observes almost systematically. He thus becomes a witness to the
dissolution,
necrosis or natural disintegration of cancerous tumours in a few weeks,
without
chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery.
In
view of his many positive results
in terms of healing, Geerd Hamer urgently wrote a post-doctoral thesis,
which
he submitted to the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Tübingen
in
October 1981. His goal is to obtain a qualification as a university
professor,
and to officially recognize his new medicine, so that it can be taught
in all
the medical schools of Germany and the world. His goal is also to
provide his
results to the university so that they can be tested as quickly as
possible for
the benefit of all patients. In his thesis, Dr. Hamer states the first
four
biological laws of a theory that will count five in total and that he
called at
the time the new medicine.
His
first law establishes the
redundant and permanent links that exist between the psychic feeling
related to
a shock, the cerebral zone where a focus is observable and the affected
organ corresponding.
This law, which we just talked about a few moments ago, was called by
Hamer,
the iron
law of cancer, because he considers it to be as
solid as a law of
physics, a law that alone would earn him a Nobel Prize in Medicine.
His
second law describes how each
level of the triad psyche brain organs evolves naturally according to
two
distinct phases. The first phase called sympathicotonia is when the
individual
is still over-stressed. It is during this first phase that a focus of
Hamer
appears in the brain and that the disease settles in the organ. The
second
phase begins when the individual drops his over-stress; either by
concretely
solving the dramatic situation or by healing the emotional trauma
associated
with it. It is during this phase called vagotonia that the Hamer focus
in the
brain is filled with glial fluid and the natural processes of repair
are
manifested in the affected organ.
Intrigued
by the fact that a cancer of
the stomach or liver does not evolve in much the same way as bone or
skin
cancer, Hamer understands that these differences depend exclusively on
the
embryological origin of the liver organ affected. This is what he
states in his
third law that would also justify another Nobel Prize. He then
classifies
cancers and diseases according to whether the organ concerned is
derived from
the endoderm, the old mesoderm, the new mesoderm or the ectoderm.
Thanks to
this, what seemed confused, complicated and illogical in these
physiological
manifestations becomes at once luminously and coherently simple.
In
his 4th law, Dr. Hamer demonstrates
that during the phase of repair, the one he calls the vagotonia phase,
the
brain specifically uses the microbes in the body to help the affected
organ
return to its normal state. In addition, he discovers that the choice
of
microbe involved does not happen randomly. For organs from the endoderm
such as
the stomach, liver, intestine, mammary glands or lungs, the brain uses
fungi,
mycobacteria and bacilli. Their missions: disaggregate, deconstruct,
and dissolve
the tumours to allow their natural evacuation. On the other hand, for
the
organs resulting from the ectoderm like the bones, the gonads, the
arteries or
the skin, it is the viruses or certain bacteria that are mobilized to
repair,
rebuild, reconstitute the damaged tissues. Therefore, with this simple
law, the
fundamentals of virology and immunology collapse to make room for a new
vision
where fungi, bacteria, and viruses act under the complete control of
the brain
to help the body to rebalance.
The
fifth law, he states a few years
later. He calls it the
law of quintessence because it gives the deep
meaning of
these manifestations of life that we call: Diseases. According to this
law, by
far the most daring of all, the disease is a well-founded programme of
nature
that provides an emergency response to a situation where biological
survival is
at stake. In other words, according to Dr. Hamer, in a specific organ,
a cancer
cell fulfils exactly the same function as a normal cell but in a
super-efficient
way. Once the danger has been removed, the body no longer needs this
over-revving mode of operation. The brain ends the first phase of the
programme
and then switches to the second phase: that of returning to normal,
where the
tumour obviously useless disintegrates, necroses or encysts naturally
according
to predictable and observable processes.
When
he submits his thesis, Dr. Hamer
attaches 200 complete files from the 6500 records of cancer patients he
reviewed and followed. It is certain that the scientific community will
not be
able to do otherwise than to recognize the relevance of his work, since
all his
files corroborate 100% the statement of these four biological laws. In
response, the University of Tübingen refuses to officially read and
examine his
work, a rare event in the world of science. To date, the University of
Tübingen
has been condemned 3 times by the civil courts: in 1986, 1992, and
2006.
Despite these injunctions and convictions, it still has not agreed to
consider
Dr. Hamer's thesis 25 years later. However, in 1992, at the request of
Hamer’s
lawyer, the order of doctors is forced to check the survival rate of
6500
patients treated by Hamer with his original method. As the files have
been
searched, it is easy for them to trace all these people. The result is
staggering: 92% of Hamer patients were still alive more than 5 years
after the
diagnosis of cancer. The official rate of school medicine barely
reaches 30%
survival after 5 years.
Since
1981, the theories of new
medicine have been 100% verified by independent groups of physicians
and
oncologists on 28 occasions in several European countries.
In
December 1988, for example, in
Vienna, Austria, the pope of Austrian oncology, Professor Birkmayer
brings
together three other doctors around Dr. Hamer and checks the law of
cancer in
100% of cases on seven unknown patients of the father of new medicine.
In
May 1990, in Namur, Belgium, around
40 doctors and health practitioners checked the veracity of the new
medicine on
all patients presented to Hamer.
In
June 1992, at the Faculty of
Medicine in Düsseldorf, Germany, Professor and Dr. Stemmann chaired a
medical
conference during which 24 cases were examined; each case with 4 to 5
diseases.
The 24 cases included the following diseases: cancer, leukemia,
psychosis,
multiple sclerosis, diabetes, allergies, epilepsies, brain tumours,
infectious
diseases, tuberculosis and sarcomas. Through these hundred diseases,
the laws
of the new medicine were verified in 100% of the cases.
In
September 1998, the Cancer
Institute at the University of Trnava in the Czech Republic invited Dr.
Hamer
to submit to an investigation of the new medicine laws on seven cases
involving
about 20 diseases in total. Each time, all the scientists who agreed to
check Hamer's
laws are convinced, without exception, of their relevance and veracity.
Today,
hundreds of doctors have integrated this approach into their daily
practices
successfully, but they are forced to hide so as not to suffer the same
fate as
Hamer. For disrupting the scientific theories and beliefs of his time
is not
without risk, for one who has the impertinent audacity to support his
thesis,
one against all. Both Galileo and Hamer have experienced what it costs
to
propose a new paradigm in an area where the stakes of power are
enormous.
In
1610, by publishing his book, The
Celestial Messenger, Galileo brought about a new vision of astronomy,
the
planetary system, and the laws that governed it. His theory was
rigorously
established according to the laws of objectivity and reproductivity in
force in
the scientific world. All his findings could be demonstrated
mathematically.
In
1981, Dr. Hamer's post-doctoral
dissertation also brought about a new vision of disease evolution and
cure. His
theory was also rigorously established and reproducible according to
the same
principles in force in the scientific world. Yet a decree of 1616
condemns
Copernicus's theories and declares Galilean theories stupid and false
because
they are incompatible with the writings of the Holy Bible. But he
himself is
not worried thanks to the intervention of some of his very influential
friends.
Directly
after the submission of his
thesis in 1981, Hamer was thrown out of the oncology department of the
Munich
University Hospital where he is head. But he is allowed to continue his
personal research, to treat his patients in private and to intervene in
the
media of Austria and Switzerland.
In
1633, Galileo was again put on the
spot following the publication of his dialogue: First
attempt of a physicist in history and masterpiece of logical
argument. He is dragged before the tribunal of the
inquisition and judged
by the holy office. Not to suffer the same fate as Jordano Bruno who
was burned
alive because of his work on materialism and the plurality of worlds,
Galileo
retracts, abjure his theories and asks pardon on his knees. It was June
16,
1633.
In
1986, in the face of his refusal to
abjure his scientific convictions, the court removed from Hamer his
right to
practice medicine, considering him as dangerous and insane.
Between
1986 and 1996, Hamer narrowly
escaped four attempts at psychiatric confinement.
Between
May 1997 and May 1998, he was
imprisoned in Cologne Prison for providing information to three
patients while
he no longer had a doctor's license.
From
September 2004 to February 2006,
he was imprisoned in Fleury Mérogis for instigating the illegal
practice of
medicine.
On
several occasions, the medical
order and the civil courts begged Dr. Hamer to give up his theories. He
never
agreed to kneel, unlike Galileo, and he lost everything: his career,
his
reputation, his wealth, his right to practice medicine and even the
life of his
wife who died of a heart attack in 1985.
The
inquisition is not dead. It only
changed shape and face. Galileo will finish the last 9 years of his
life blind
and cooped up in a residence in the Florence region.
After
taking refuge in the south of
Spain until March 2007, Dr. Hamer was forced to flee again to a secret
destination far from Europe. In any case, it has been a while since he
had been
prohibited from setting foot in France or in Germany, or to give public
lectures.
It
was not until 1983, 350 years
later, that the Catholic Church recognized by the voice of John Paul
II, his
error in the trial of Galileo. How long will it take for the scientific
world
to recognize his mistake with Dr. Hamer's discoveries?
Hamer's thought:
And why should I have this knowledge and that
he, the lady next door,
the man over there must die? Why him, he must swallow chemistry until
he falls
sick, until he eventually dies? This is not normal.
In
Galileo, as in Hamer, one may
wonder why a real scientific debate is not possible. In the 17th
century, the
motivation of the holy office was to keep the Bible as the sole means
of
knowledge. Above all, it was necessary to keep Christians in a state of
ignorance favouring superstition and submission to a divine law
superior to all
scientific laws. Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo are part of this
movement,
which was called the Renaissance and which wanted to put man back in
the centre
of the universe and no longer God. By relegating the earth to the
simple status
of a planet orbiting the sun, they relegated at the same time the
planet
created and elected by God on the periphery of the world. For
ideological and
power reasons, this position was unacceptable to the church.
In
the 20th century, what could be the
motivation of scientists to refuse to examine works that could save
millions of
lives every year? Could it be the fear of losing face by realizing how
firmly
they affirmed statements that were ultimately only unverified
assumptions?
Could it be the fear of becoming useless because there is no longer any
need to
understand the genetic mechanisms or to find a vaccine to cure cancer?
Could
this be the pressure of the medical-pharmaceutical complex that has no
interest
in the fact that cancer can be cured as easily and without excessive
financial
or biological costs? It is true that each cancer patient brings back to
the
system an average of $ 180,000. Or would it simply be the fear of
losing power
by seeing patients become responsible for their own healing process by
learning
to resolve the conflicts that led to their cancer?
Galileo's
fault is to have put man
back in the centre of the world. The fault of Hamer is to have put man
at the
centre of his recovery. In both cases, it is not good to give back the
power to
the individual to the detriment of the institutions whatever they are.
In
science, as in other areas where power issues are strong, it is not
good to be
the only one who is right against all. Galileo made the painful
experience. 350
years later, Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer is still experiencing it at the time
when
this documentary is made.
Even
today, in Germany alone, 1500
people with cancer die every day without being offered real
alternatives to the
moral and physical suffering they endure. [End of Story].
With
what you just read, you
understand more easily that to describe the so-called conventional
medicine as
criminal medicine does not in any way constitute defamation. You are
simply
confronted with the sad reality. All the evidence of the crimes of the
criminal
mafia that controls the so-called conventional medicine is there. In
order not
to make this teaching unnecessarily lengthy, we recommend that you read
the
articles entitled "Sickness and
Nutrition", "The
Vaccine: An Extremely Dangerous Poison", and "The Truth about AIDS".
You will find them on the website www.mcreveil.org, under the heading
Health.
If
Dr. Hamer were an African or a
Black man, one would have thought that his persecution would be related
to the
colour of his skin. He is not African, and he is not a dark-skinned
man. He is
white; he is German; he is European. Then understand very well that the
war
against the demons who manage the criminal medicine that you call
conventional
medicine, has nothing to do with the colour of the skin. It is rather a
war
that satan and his agents wage against the rest of the mankind on the
earth.
This
article, like many of those we
have already made available to you, proves and confirms that
conventional
medicine is a purely criminal medicine, which is not intended to heal
or cure,
but rather to kill. This is the reason why all medications that heal
are
forbidden, and all the doctors who work in the direction of curing the
sick are
struck off the medical registrar, and their licence withdrawn. Some are
murdered, others jailed, others forbidden to practice.
Whenever
someone dares to raise their
voice against the organised crime of the C medicine and its abominable
practices, his assassination is quickly organised. Do a little research
on the
internet and you will see that many of those who denounced vaccines or
other
lies of conventional medicine and pharmaceutical cartels, died in
bizarre
conditions. Every time they are murdered, they are accused of suicide.
The
drugs proposed by these demons who
control the pharmaceutical companies are not medicines to cure our
diseases,
but rather poisons to keep us captive by the disease, and kill us
later. The
luciferians who profit from these pharmaceutical-mystical cartels, have
never
worked in the direction of doing good to men. This is the reason why,
knowing
that many of us will never get sick, they plan diseases against us,
imposing
vaccines that are nothing but poisons that will make us sick later. And
as soon
as you're sick, you turn to the poisoned drugs they make. And the
result is
death, after spending the little money we had on these poison drugs.
That's the
reality.
Since
they want to kill all the sick
and do not want anyone to escape, they block any other means of
healing, and
tell the world that the only medicine recognised and accepted is their
own
medicine, that they call conventional medicine. All other medicines,
according
to them, are illegal,
and doctors who dare to offer patients solutions that
heal suffer the fate described above. That is to say, they are either
murdered,
taken to court and thrown into prison, or struck off the medical
registrar with
a prohibition on practicing.
Medicine
has become a weapon of mass
destruction, and drugs have become a real subject of blackmail and
intimidation
for these murderers. You saw the demonstration of what I am explaining
to you
in 2010 when these schizophrenic great leaders of this world wanted to
succeed
in their coup d'état against President Laurent Gbagbo in Côte d'Ivoire.
We
experienced this odious spectacle live and globally.
The
so-called leaders of purported
democratic and civilized nations, in their baseness and in great
despair,
proved to the whole world that their medicine, which they like to
present as
conventional, legal, etc., was a criminal medicine, a tool of
imperialism,
domination, and enslavement of the weakest. To confirm that they were
only
vulgar criminals, murderers and lawless people, they took the ignoble
decision
to place an embargo on the drugs in destination to Côte d'Ivoire,
without any
scruple and without shame.
It's
full of smiles that these rascals
announced to the media worldwide that they have ordered the genocide of
more
than 30 million Africans in Côte d'Ivoire, depriving them of any
medicine.
Those who always impose on you drugs and other vaccines under the
pretext of
wanting to save you, showed you their true faces and revealed to you
the true
purpose of their medications. You now understand the state of mind of
those who
are hidden behind the criminal medicine erroneously called conventional
medicine, and you can more easily understand what this medicine really
does. Do
I need to tell you more?
Among
the victims of this embargo
imposed by the so-called civilized leaders on medicines, there were
men, women,
elderly people, children, infants, pregnant women, breastfeeding women,
the
disabled, etc. But the most civilized leaders in the world, the donors
of
democracy lessons and teachers of various rights including the rights
of the
abominable and animals, the imposers of free vaccines and other
so-called
proofs of civilization, did not care a damn.
Let's
talk a bit about the notion of legality.
These snakes who think they are gods tell you about their medicine as
being
legal. Legal as compared to what? You should ask yourself this
question. The
weapon these hypocrites use to chase, imprison, and even justify the
killing of
real humane doctors like Dr. Hamer is to accuse them of practising or
encouraging the "illegal"
practice of medicine. The simple question
you need to ask yourself is who are these people who seem to love you
more than
you love yourself? These are impostors that give the impression that
they love
you more than you love yourselves. They love you so much that it is up
to them
to impose their medicine on you, that which they arrogate the right to
qualify
as legal. Legal as
compared to what?
There
is one thing you absolutely must
understand. Whether you believe in God or not, it is established that
God
exists. And whether you believe in God or not, it is equally
established that
it is God who created man, with the possible exception of Darwin, who
may have
descended from the monkey. The Creator God of the Heavens and Earth, He
who
created men and who holds all power over men, imposes nothing on them.
Although
this God speaks to us of eternal Hell or eternal Paradise as the only
option
that awaits every man after life on earth, He does not impose anything
on us.
He presents to us the eternal happiness of paradise and the eternal
torment of
Hell, but leaves us the choice, without imposing anything.
If
the God who created us and who
holds all the power over us leaves us free to make our choices, who are
those
who place themselves above God the creator, and arrogate to themselves
the
right to impose their will on us, and to make our choices in our place?
Don't
you find that absurd? The Bible tells us in Deuteronomy 30:19 "... I have set before you life and
death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your
children may
live." God, who knows the delights of eternal life and the
horror of
eternal fire, chooses to advise us to choose eternal happiness, but
without
imposing it on us. How is it that some demons believe themselves able
to seize
from us the freedom of choice that is so precious in the eyes of God
the
Creator?
Is
it not time you put an end to this
madness? If you are able to say no to God, when you would gain
everything by
saying yes to Him, why is it to men that you are incapable of saying
no?
Remember that your health must depend on you and you alone. If you are
sick, it
is up to you to choose where to get treatment, and what medications or
drugs to
take, if you want them. Legal medicine for you is the one you find
legal, that
is to say the one that is legal in your eyes and according to your
judgment,
and not the one that someone else imposes on you as legal. Now that you
know
very well what C Medicine is, that is, Criminal, or Conventional, or
Chemical,
you will make an informed choice.
Grace
to all who love our Lord Jesus
Christ with an undying love!
Dear brothers and sisters,
If you have run away from fake churches and would like to know what to do, here are the two options available to you:
1- See if around you there are some other children of God who fear God and desire to live according to the Sound Doctrine. If you find any, feel free to join them.
2- If you do not find one and wish to join us, our doors are open to you. The only thing we will ask you to do is to first read all the Teachings that the Lord has given us, and which are on our website www.mcreveil.org, to reassure yourself that they are in conformity with the Bible. If you find them in accordance with the Bible, and are ready to submit to Jesus Christ, and live by the demands of His word, we will gladly welcome you.
The grace of the Lord Jesus be with you!
Source & Contact:
Website: https://www.mcreveil.org
E-mail: mail@mcreveil.org